The applicant sought to re-litigate issues concerning the sale of the matrimonial home, despite a prior final order granting the respondent sole carriage of the sale.
The respondent brought a cross-motion seeking an order for the applicant to vacate the home and for costs.
The court dismissed the applicant's motion, finding it lacked jurisdiction to alter the prior order, and granted the respondent's request for the applicant to vacate the matrimonial home and for costs, citing the applicant's unreasonable conduct and non-compliance with court orders.
