In an application for certification, an intervener union filed its own application for certification.
The Board considered whether employees must be given notice of the intervener's application.
Both the applicant and intervener opposed giving notice, arguing that a vote was likely and employee petitions would be irrelevant.
The Board rejected this argument, holding that employees have a right to participate in certification proceedings and must be given meaningful notice of a second application.
The Board directed the employer to post notices of the intervener's application.
