The appellant appealed an order reducing his child support arrears and imputing an income of $39,000 to him.
He argued that his actual income as a bingo caller was much lower than his previous income as a meat cutter, and that the motions judge erred in imputing the higher amount.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding that the affidavit evidence provided an ample basis for the motions judge's finding of underemployment and the imputed income amount.
