The accused was treated at a hospital for a gunshot wound to his hand, which he initially claimed was from a nail gun.
Police investigated a commercial unit leased by the accused where a bullet hole and blood were found.
Officers questioned the accused at the hospital, eventually detaining him without providing right to counsel, rendering his later statements inadmissible under s. 10(b) of the Charter.
Fearing an injured person was inside the unit, police conducted a warrantless entry, which the court found lawful under exigent circumstances.
A subsequent search warrant yielded firearms, ammunition, and marijuana.
The physical evidence was ruled admissible, leading to the accused's conviction.
