The accused, D.K., was charged with sexual assault.
The complainant, C.V., alleged D.K. sexually assaulted her after a dorm party, while D.K. claimed consensual participation.
The court heard conflicting testimonies from both parties.
Applying the principles from R. v. W.(D.), the court found D.K.'s evidence plausible and identified inconsistencies and reliability concerns in the complainant's testimony, particularly regarding her memory of subsequent interactions and the circumstances of clothing removal.
Ultimately, the court was left with a reasonable doubt as to D.K.'s guilt and dismissed the charge.
