The parties separated after a 29-year marriage.
The respondent sought equalization and spousal support.
The court found the respondent abandoned her equalization claim by failing to obtain a business valuation for the applicant's company, despite court orders.
However, the court awarded the respondent retroactive and ongoing compensatory and non-compensatory spousal support, imputing income to both parties due to the applicant's unreliable financial disclosure and consumer proposal, and the respondent's capacity to earn income.
