The applicant mortgagee sought clarification of amendments to a Restraint and Management Order relating to property subject to ongoing criminal forfeiture proceedings.
The court reconsidered wording from an earlier decision and modified several provisions governing access to the property and the scope of available mortgage enforcement remedies.
The court confirmed that the mortgagee could pursue remedies including foreclosure, power of sale, judicial sale, and possession, while revising language concerning access facilitated by the property manager.
The court declined to require that all sale proceeds be paid into court at this stage, finding such an order premature given the unusual procedural context.
The endorsement further directed that all proceedings affecting the property be brought before the same judge to avoid fragmentation.
