In the context of competing applications arising from a disputed annual general meeting, the parties brought motions to compel answers to questions refused during cross-examinations.
The court held that an applicant could not withdraw a statement in his affidavit referencing legal advice and that the statement constituted a waiver of solicitor-client privilege, requiring him to answer questions about the advice.
The court also ordered an expert witness to produce draft reports and communications with counsel, finding that tendering the expert waived litigation privilege over those materials.
Other requests for production and answers were dismissed for lack of relevance.
