1 total
Review request of TLAB decision refusing minor variances dismissed; no procedural unfairness or errors of law found.
The Applicant requested a review of a TLAB Final Decision that allowed an appeal and refused minor variances for a third-story addition.
The Applicant alleged the presiding Member exhibited bias, violated procedural fairness, and made errors of fact and law, particularly by requiring numerical data to establish 'prevailing' density under the Official Plan.
The reviewing Member dismissed the review request, finding no procedural unfairness or bias.
The reviewing Member also held that the original Member did not err in law by requiring quantitative evidence of floor space index in the immediate context, and that the decision was reasonable overall.
No co-appearing lawyers found.
No judges found.