The appellant appealed his convictions and sentences for robbery with a firearm and related offences arising from a home invasion.
The Crown's case relied entirely on circumstantial evidence, specifically DNA found on bandanas and a police baton seized from the appellant's apartment.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the conviction appeal, finding the jury's verdicts were not unreasonable.
However, the sentence appeal was allowed to make a two-year sentence for weapon possession concurrent rather than consecutive, reducing the net sentence to five years and four months.
