Terri Cox

The applicant appealed the conditions of a draft plan of subdivision, specifically contesting the County's requirements for additional hydrogeological studies to protect the municipal water supply located in the Norwood Esker.

The applicant argued that sufficient work had already been done and that the County's demands were unnecessary and inequitable.

The Tribunal preferred the evidence of the County's hydrogeological experts, finding that a precautionary approach was warranted given the high vulnerability of the village's water source.

The Tribunal concluded that the County's revised conditions were reasonable, consistent with provincial policies on source water protection, and represented good planning in the public interest.

The appeal was dismissed.