Stephanie Mirtitsch

The applicant appealed the City of Hamilton's failure to make a decision on a Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a residential development.

The parties reached a settlement for a revised proposal consisting of two residential buildings providing 519 rental apartment units.

Based on uncontroverted expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the settlement proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, in conformity with the City's Urban Official Plan, and representative of good planning.

The appeal was allowed in part to implement the settlement.

The appellant appealed the City of Hamilton's refusal to approve an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendments, and a Draft Plan of Subdivision to facilitate a residential development of up to 322 units.

Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement.

The Tribunal approved the settlement, finding the proposed development consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement and in conformity with the applicable official plans, representing good land use planning.

The applicant appealed the municipality's failure to make a decision on applications for an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a 6-storey residential apartment building.

The parties reached a settlement.

Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the revised Zoning By-law Amendment consistent with provincial policies and the municipal Official Plan.

The Tribunal approved the Zoning By-law Amendment and noted the Official Plan Amendment appeal was withdrawn as it was no longer required.