Sebastian Alzamora

The applicant appealed the City of Brampton's failure to make a decision on applications for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and draft Plan of Subdivision to permit a 57-lot residential subdivision.

Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement.

The Tribunal found that the revised proposal was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, conformed to the Growth Plan, and represented good planning.

The appeals were allowed in part, and the planning instruments were approved in principle subject to conditions.

The applicant appealed the City of Brampton's failure to make a decision on applications for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and draft Plan of Subdivision to permit a residential development.

Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement on a revised proposal for 58 detached residential dwellings.

The Tribunal accepted uncontroverted expert planning and transportation evidence that the revised proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, conforms to the Growth Plan, and represents good planning.

The appeals were allowed in part, and the planning instruments were approved in principle subject to conditions.