The accused was charged with multiple firearm and probation-related offences after running through a residential townhouse complex carrying a loaded prohibited handgun following a shooting incident.
He admitted possessing the firearm but argued he did so out of necessity after hearing gunfire and fearing for his life.
The court rejected the accused’s explanation, finding his testimony inconsistent with surveillance footage and other evidence, and concluded he armed himself to seek out the attackers rather than escape danger.
The defence of necessity therefore had no factual foundation.
The court convicted the accused of multiple firearm possession offences, breach of prohibition and probation orders, and using a firearm without reasonable precaution.
