3 total
Zoning by-law amendment and site plan approved for 8-storey apartment building following settlement.
The applicant appealed the City of Orillia's failure to make a decision on zoning by-law amendment and site plan approval applications for an 8-storey apartment building.
The parties reached a settlement prior to the hearing.
Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the proposed development is consistent with provincial policies, conforms to the official plan, and represents good planning.
The appeal was allowed in part, approving the zoning by-law amendment and granting interim approval of the site plan.
Zoning By-law Amendment for 16-unit townhouse development approved in principle following settlement.
The applicant appealed the Town of Georgina's failure to make a decision on a Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a 16-unit townhouse development.
Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement.
Based on uncontroverted expert planning and transportation evidence, the Tribunal found the proposed development consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and in conformity with the Growth Plan and applicable Official Plans.
The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part and approved the amendment in principle, withholding its final order pending the finalization of the site plan and the amending by-law.
Tribunal approves residential subdivision settlement but withholds final order pending resolution of servicing pre-conditions.
The applicant appealed the Town's failure to make a decision on applications for a zoning by-law amendment and draft plan of subdivision for a residential development in Mount Albert.
At a settlement hearing, all parties agreed to the proposed instruments.
The Tribunal accepted uncontested expert planning evidence that the development satisfies statutory requirements and represents good planning.
The Tribunal found the instruments suitable for approval but withheld its final order pending the applicant's satisfaction of the Region's pre-conditions regarding water and wastewater services.
No co-appearing lawyers found.
No judges found.