Ms. Powell

The appellant sought a minor variance to extend a second-floor rear deck by 0.5 metres beyond the permitted 1.8 metres.

The Committee of Adjustment refused the variance, and the appellant appealed to the Toronto Local Appeal Body.

Opposing neighbours argued the extension would cause a loss of privacy and devalue their property.

The Tribunal found that the variance maintained the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and zoning by-law, was desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and was minor in nature.

The appeal was allowed and the variance was authorized.