1 total
Motion for costs dismissed as responding parties' conduct was not unreasonable, frivolous, or vexatious.
The applicant, having been successful in its appeal regarding a minor variance application, brought a motion for costs against the City and a self-represented party.
The applicant argued that the City was responsible for the Committee of Adjustment's delay, advanced a weak case, and caused delays through late filings.
The Tribunal dismissed the motion, finding no evidence of unreasonable, frivolous, vexatious, or bad faith conduct by either responding party.
No co-appearing lawyers found.
No judges found.
