The accused was charged with one count of sexual assault following an incident at his apartment.
The complainant alleged that the accused forced intercourse and digitally penetrated her, while the accused denied any sexual contact, claiming he only physically struggled to remove her from his home.
The court assessed the credibility of both parties, applying the W.(D.) framework.
Relying on the complainant's credible testimony, corroborating physical evidence including damage to the apartment, and DNA evidence linking the accused to a condom found at the scene, the court found the accused guilty of sexual assault.
