Reconsideration requests from both parties dismissed; no errors of law or procedural fairness breaches found.
Both the applicant and the respondent requested reconsideration of a Licence Appeal Tribunal decision regarding statutory accident benefits.
The respondent argued the adjudicator erred in law by not including language about post-accident income deductions in the income replacement benefit order.
The applicant argued the adjudicator breached procedural fairness and erred in law by admitting a medical report without the author being available for cross-examination, refusing to issue summonses, and failing to provide adequate reasons regarding catastrophic impairment.
The Tribunal dismissed both requests, finding no errors of law, fact, or breaches of procedural fairness that would have changed the outcome.
The respondent's request for costs was also dismissed.
OLATOntario Licence Appeal TribunalMay 23, 2025