Kevin Eby

The applicant appealed the Town of Fort Erie's refusal of a Zoning By-law Amendment to permit the development of eight new residential units on a waterfront property.

The Tribunal considered issues related to stormwater management, environmental impacts, and conformity with local land use planning policies.

While finding that a holding provision could address stormwater and environmental concerns, the Tribunal ultimately dismissed the appeal.

The Tribunal concluded that the proposed urban form of development was uncharacteristic of the surrounding hodgepodge cottage country, did not harmoniously integrate into the waterfront community, and failed to conform to the Town's Official Plan and the Crystal Beach Secondary Plan.

The Town of Fort Erie brought a motion seeking partial approval of Official Plan Amendment No. 56 (the Crystal Beach Secondary Plan) and Zoning By-law No. 144-2021, bringing them into force except for the specific properties under appeal.

The Tribunal applied the four-part test from Casertano and found that the planning evidence supported the secondary plan, the remaining appeals were scoped to site-specific properties, the draft order protected the remaining appeals, and partial approval was in the public interest to allow other development applications to proceed.

The motion was granted.

The applicant sought a declaration that his property's seasonal use as a "camping and recreational compound" with a travel trailer constituted a legal non-conforming use under the Planning Act.

The respondent, an adjacent landowner, counter-applied for a declaration that the use was not lawful.

The court found the relevant zoning by-law clear and unambiguous, permitting only "park" or "open pavilion" uses in the "Hazard Land Zone" thereby prohibiting the applicant's recreational vehicle use.

The applicant failed to establish a legal non-conforming use or that the municipality was estopped from enforcing the by-law due to "officially induced error" as the municipal officials who provided advice lacked the authority to bind the municipality on zoning matters.

The application was dismissed, and the counter-application was granted.