The applicant wife sought an unequal division of net family property or compensatory spousal support, while the respondent husband sought to exclude his share of a lawsuit settlement from his net family property calculation.
The court found that the husband successfully rebutted the presumption of joint ownership regarding the settlement funds deposited into a joint investment account, allowing him to exclude the majority of the funds on a pro rata basis.
The court dismissed the wife's claims for an unequal division of net family property and spousal support, finding no unconscionability or economic disadvantage.
