The parties separated after a five-year marriage.
The mother sought retroactive and ongoing child and spousal support, and equalization of net family property.
The court found that the father engaged in monumental and self-serving financial nondisclosure regarding his businesses in Canada and Nigeria.
Drawing a strong adverse inference, the court imputed the father's income at $130,000 for most years due to intentional underemployment and hidden income.
The father was ordered to pay child support and indefinite spousal support at the high end of the SSAG range, along with a substantial equalization payment.
