Kathleen Spence

The Applicant sought leave to appeal the Director's decision to issue an Environmental Compliance Approval for a hot-mix asphalt plant to operate in conjunction with an existing quarry.

The Applicant argued the decision was unreasonable because the Director failed to properly consider the Statement of Environmental Values, cumulative effects, common law rights, and applicable guidelines.

The Tribunal found that the Applicant failed to demonstrate that no reasonable person could have made the decision, as the Director appropriately considered the relevant studies, policies, and mitigation measures.

The application for leave to appeal was dismissed.

The applicant sought leave to appeal the Director's decision to issue an Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA) for a metal recycling facility, raising concerns about noise and air emissions from a metal shredder.

The applicant argued that the decision was unreasonable because an acoustic audit should have been required prior to issuance, the ECA conflicted with the Fire Code, and the facility was not authorized under municipal planning requirements.

The Ontario Land Tribunal dismissed the application, finding that the applicant failed to establish a prima facie case that the Director's decision was unreasonable.

The Tribunal held that the Director properly considered the applicable regulatory and policy requirements, that requiring an acoustic audit after the ECA's issuance was consistent with Ministry practice, and that the Director was not required to resolve Fire Code or municipal planning issues before issuing the ECA.