This case addresses the determination of ongoing spousal and child support obligations following a divorce, as well as claims for retroactive support.
The court determined the applicant's income based on a three-year rolling average of his professional corporation's earnings and imputed income to the self-represented respondent due to intentional under-employment.
Ongoing spousal support was ordered for the respondent, and child support was ordered for the applicant, with the amounts set off to ensure timely payments.
The court declined to order retroactive adjustments, citing the respondent's failure to disclose income and misuse of funds intended for a child's postsecondary education.