3 total
Appeals for 28-storey tower in Church Street Village Character Area dismissed for non-conformity with mid-rise policies.
The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's refusal of official plan and zoning by-law amendments, as well as a site plan application and a heritage alteration permit, to permit a 28-storey mixed-use building in the Church Street Village Character Area (CSVCA).
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, finding that the proposed tall building form was incompatible with the planned mid-rise context of the CSVCA under the North Downtown Yonge Site and Area Specific Policy (SASP 382).
The Tribunal held that the proposal failed to conform to angular plane policies, would cast unacceptable new net shadows on Barbara Hall Park, and did not represent good planning or urban design despite its location in a Major Transit Station Area.
Appeals for a 36-storey mixed-use development dismissed due to excessive height and incompatible massing.
The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's refusal to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-laws to permit a 36-storey mixed-use building at the corner of Wellesley Street East and Church Street.
The Tribunal evaluated the proposal against the existing and planned context, including the Church Street Village Character Area and the Wellesley Wood Character Area.
While the Tribunal found the shadow impacts acceptable and the tower design mitigating, it ultimately concluded that the proposed height and massing were excessive and incompatible with the low-rise character of Church Street.
The appeals were dismissed and the requested amendments were not approved.
Appeals for a 36-storey mixed-use building dismissed as height and massing do not fit the planned context.
The site straddles two Character Areas with different planned contexts.
The applicant argued the tower's location and design mitigated impacts and fit the tall building context of Wellesley Street.
The City opposed the development, arguing the height and massing were excessive, did not respect the low-rise character of Church Street, and would cause unacceptable shadow impacts on a nearby park and damage mature trees.
The Tribunal found the shadow impacts acceptable but agreed with the City that the proposed 36-storey height and massing did not fit the existing and planned context of the area, particularly its proximity to the low-rise Church Street Village.
The appeals were dismissed.
No co-appearing lawyers found.
No judges found.