2 total
Punitive damages award against insurer set aside as conduct was not sufficiently outrageous to warrant punishment.
The respondent's dairy barn and livestock were destroyed in a fire.
The appellant insurer paid over $1.17 million under the policy but disputed other aspects of the claim, including loss of livestock, loss of earnings, and damage to silos.
At trial, the jury awarded the respondent an additional $488,389 in compensatory damages and $750,000 in punitive damages for the insurer's breach of its duty of good faith.
The insurer appealed.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the punitive damages award.
The Court held that while the insurer breached its duty to act fairly and in good faith by failing to promptly pay amounts it reasonably believed were owing, its conduct was not so outrageous or extreme as to warrant punishment.
Insured entitled to ongoing weekly income benefits as he lacked training for proposed sedentary occupations.
The applicant, a self-employed taxi driver, was injured in a motor vehicle accident and received weekly income benefits for four years.
The insurer terminated benefits on the basis that the applicant could engage in suitable employment.
The arbitrator found that the applicant did not have the education, training, or experience for the sedentary jobs proposed by the insurer and had made bona fide efforts to retrain.
The arbitrator ordered the reinstatement of weekly income benefits, calculated the quantum at $385 per week based on pre-accident self-employment income and ceasing expenses, and dismissed the insurer's claim for repayment of an overpayment since the benefits were ongoing.