1 total
Application regarding noise from apple storage facility dismissed as neighbour failed to prove substantial interference.
The applicant neighbour brought an application under the Farming and Food Production Protection Act, 1998, alleging a noise disturbance from the respondent's apple storage facility.
The respondent had rebuilt its facility and relocated its controlled atmosphere equipment, including condenser fans and a nitrogen generator, closer to the applicant's property.
The Board applied the common law nuisance test to determine if the applicant was directly affected by the disturbance.
The Board found that the applicant failed to establish substantial interference with the use and enjoyment of his property, noting the agricultural character of the neighbourhood and the respondent's efforts to buffer the noise.
The application was dismissed.
No co-appearing lawyers found.
No judges found.