In a family law costs endorsement arising from an acrimonious custody dispute, the applicant sought costs after the respondent withdrew a motion to change a prior parenting order.
The court declined to fix costs immediately and instead adjourned the costs motion to be heard after June 30, 2015, together with issues relating to access.
The court reasoned that leaving costs outstanding could incentivize both parties to work toward resolving access in the child's best interests.
The court also permitted further evidence regarding access and an updated report from the child psychiatrist.
