The appellant father appealed a motion judge's decision dismissing his motion to terminate child support for his two adult children.
He argued that his income had decreased, that the children refused to have a relationship with him, and that the motion judge breached procedural fairness.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding no breach of natural justice, no error in the motion judge's conclusion that there was no material change in financial circumstances, and no error in relying on a psychologist's report which concluded the father's own abusive behaviour caused the estrangement.
