2 total
Medical discipline findings partially set aside and revocation penalty quashed due to ignored expert evidence.
The appellant physician appealed a decision of the Discipline Committee of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, which found him guilty of professional misconduct and revoked his certificate of registration.
The charges related to his conduct during a patient's unsuccessful resuscitation, his use of heavy sedation for nerve blocks, and his prescription of high-dose opioids for chronic pain patients.
The Divisional Court upheld the Committee's findings regarding the resuscitation and the use of sedation, finding them reasonable based on the evidence.
However, the Court set aside the findings related to opioid prescriptions and a toxic dose of Marcaine, concluding the Committee ignored crucial defence expert testimony and relied on a charting error.
The penalty of revocation was set aside as excessive and the matter was remitted to a differently constituted Committee.
Accident benefits denied due to applicant's lack of credibility and surveillance evidence contradicting disability claims.
The applicant was injured in a motor vehicle accident and sought statutory accident benefits, including income replacement benefits, medical benefits, and visiting expenses for his parents.
The insurer terminated benefits, arguing the applicant was not substantially disabled.
The arbitrator found the applicant lacked credibility, noting numerous inconsistencies in his medical history, functional abilities, and income reporting, which were further undermined by surveillance evidence showing him working and moving without apparent difficulty.
The arbitrator concluded the applicant did not suffer significant physical or psychological injuries as a result of the accident and dismissed all claims.