The appellant appealed the removal of her cat by Animal Welfare Services.
The cat had an advanced sarcoma on its foot, which was necrotic and discharging.
The appellant had refused amputation or euthanasia, opting for palliative care with leftover medication.
The Board found that the cat was in distress at the time of removal and that the inspector had the authority to remove it based on a veterinarian's certificate.
Although the cat's leg was subsequently amputated, the Board found it was still in distress due to the need for ongoing post-operative care.
The Board declined to return the cat to the appellant, finding she was unable to adequately provide the necessary care.
