Dr. Jonathan Siegel

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The insurer denied the claims on the basis that the applicant's injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).

The applicant argued she sustained psychological injuries that removed her from the MIG.

The Tribunal found the insurer's psychological assessment more persuasive, noting the applicant's own statements contradicted her claimed psychological impairments.

The Tribunal concluded the applicant's injuries were minor and governed by the MIG, dismissing her appeal and denying her claim for an award.

The insurer's request for costs was also denied.

The applicant, who was struck by an automobile while riding a bicycle, sought a medical and rehabilitation benefit of $10,033.92 for a chronic pain program.

The insurer denied the claim based on independent medical examinations suggesting the applicant had reached maximal medical recovery.

The Tribunal found the proposed treatment plan reasonable and necessary, preferring the evidence of the applicant's assessors which demonstrated ongoing pain and functional impairment exceeding physical signs of injury.

The appeal was allowed, and the insurer was ordered to pay the benefit with interest.