Applicant failed to prove psychological impairment warranting removal from the Minor Injury Guideline.
The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, arguing she should be removed from the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG) due to a psychological impairment.
The Tribunal found the applicant's psychological assessment unpersuasive, noting ambiguities about the supervising psychological associate's involvement and unexplained contradictions regarding the applicant's pre-existing mental health history.
As the applicant failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that she sustained a psychological condition warranting removal from the MIG, her claim for a psychological assessment and interest was dismissed.
OLATOntario Licence Appeal TribunalMar 20, 2026
