The applicant sought to call two psychologists as expert witnesses in a hearing regarding his complaint that the children's aid society failed to properly investigate his reports of his daughter being bullied at school.
The experts had been retained for a separate civil action against the school and had not met the children involved.
The adjudicator ruled that the proposed expert testimony did not meet the test of relevancy and necessity, as the hearing was focused solely on whether the society fulfilled its procedural obligations to hear the applicant's concerns and provide reasons for its decisions, not to review the merits of the society's decision to decline an investigation.