Dr. Ashley Narula

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The respondent denied benefits, arguing the applicant's injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).

The applicant claimed a psychological impairment warranted removal from the MIG and sought an income replacement benefit (IRB) and treatment plans.

The Tribunal found the applicant did not meet the burden of proving a psychological impairment or a substantial inability to perform the essential tasks of his employment as an Uber driver.

The Tribunal concluded the applicant's injuries were predominantly minor, subject to the MIG limit, and dismissed the claims for IRB, treatment plans, interest, and an award.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, including non-earner benefits and various treatment plans.

The respondent denied the claims.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to prove she suffered a complete inability to carry on a normal life, noting inconsistencies in her self-reporting and preferring the evidence of the respondent's assessors.

The Tribunal also found the disputed treatment plans were not reasonable and necessary.

The application was dismissed, and no award or costs were granted.