Child protection agency sought summary judgment declaring three children in need of protection and requesting permanent Crown wardship for twin infants.
The evidence included medical findings of multiple fractures consistent with physical abuse inflicted while the children were in the care of the mother and her partner, along with evidence of parental instability and limited parenting capacity.
The court concluded there was no genuine issue requiring a trial regarding the twins’ protection status and their best interests, and found that adoption planning through Crown wardship was appropriate.
However, the court determined that a trial was required to decide the appropriate long‑term placement for the older child.
The biological father of the twins was permitted to participate and propose a care plan.
