The defendant, a doctor, was charged with 24 counts of sexual assault and one count of sexual interference involving fifteen female patients.
The Crown alleged that the defendant intentionally touched patients' breasts and/or genitals for sexual purposes under the guise of medically unnecessary examinations, capitalizing on his position of trust.
The defense argued that some events did not occur or were medically appropriate, and alleged collusion among complainants.
The court granted the Crown's similar fact evidence application, finding a distinctive pattern of behavior and false record-keeping.
The court found the defendant's testimony lacked credibility and reliability.
Ultimately, the defendant was found guilty of 16 counts of sexual assault and 1 count of sexual interference, and acquitted on other counts due to insufficient evidence or Crown's request.
