2 total
The court upheld a 2018 consent order for property division but awarded elevated interest due to the respondent's delay, and determined support obligations based on imputed and actual incomes.
This two-day focused trial addressed financial issues between common-law ex-spouses, including the valuation and division of the jointly owned family home, repayment of mortgage interest, determination of each party's income for support purposes, and retroactive child and spousal support.
The court upheld a prior consent order regarding the property's valuation formula but awarded the applicant pre- and post-judgment interest due to the respondent's delay in payout.
The court imputed income to the applicant for her dog-breeding business for one year but declined to impute income to the respondent for his farm work.
Child and spousal support were determined based on the parties' incomes, with spousal support being compensatory and subject to review.
The respondent's claim for mortgage interest repayment and the right of first refusal were dismissed.
Court determined net family property equalization and awarded $26,500 in needs-based lump sum spousal support.
This trial addressed the equalization of net family property and spousal support following a short, financially separate marriage.
The court found no equalization payment owing as both parties had negative net family property, deemed zero under the Family Law Act.
For spousal support, no compensatory entitlement was found, but a needs-based entitlement was recognized due to the respondent's decline in living standard post-separation.
A lump sum spousal support of $26,500 was awarded to the respondent.
The applicant's claim for damages related to a matrimonial home designation was dismissed due to lack of legal basis and evidence.
