The applicant Society brought a motion for summary judgment on its status review application, seeking Crown wardship for four children.
The parents opposed, seeking the return of the children or a period of Society wardship.
The court found no genuine issue requiring a trial regarding disposition, as the parents lacked insight and had not made sustained progress to meet the children's complex needs, and granted Crown wardship.
However, the court found the parents rebutted the statutory presumption against access, ordering sibling access and access between the parents and the children, with further submissions required for the youngest two children.
