3 total
The court ordered interim directions for an incapable person's personal care and limited document production amid a dispute over the validity of recently executed powers of attorney.
This motion addresses the interim management of an incapable person's (Lionel Bascus) property and personal care, pending a full application challenging the validity of recently executed powers of attorney (POAs) and a property transfer.
The applicant, Mr. Bascus's daughter, sought directions for his care and production of records, alleging the respondent, Mr. Bascus's sister, was not acting in his best interests.
The court found the respondent was not adhering to statutory principles for substitute decision-makers, particularly regarding consultation and advocating for appropriate long-term care.
The court ordered directions for personal care, mandating consultation between the parties and access to medical information for the applicant.
It also ordered limited production of medical and solicitor records relevant to the POAs and property transfers, but denied access to financial and estate planning records.
The respondent's request to unfreeze bank accounts was denied as it was not brought by motion.
The court dismissed a son's application to compel a capacity assessment of his mother and a passing of accounts by her attorneys.
Ernest Groh applied for a capacity assessment of his 81-year-old mother, Gabriella Grohotolski, and for the suspension of her attorneys' authority (Doris Steele and Joan F. Wolfe) and an order for them to pass accounts, alleging mismanagement.
Gabriella and the attorneys opposed, asserting Gabriella's capacity and proper management.
The court dismissed Ernest's application, finding no reasonable grounds to believe Gabriella was incapable and no evidence of improper management by the attorneys.
Motion for accounting and interim guardianship dismissed as premature pending full evidentiary record.
In a guardianship proceeding under the Substitute Decisions Act involving competing powers of attorney and a dispute between siblings, the applicant sought orders compelling the respondent attorney to pass accounts, appointing an interim guardian of property, and adjournment of the guardianship application pending the accounting.
The court held that the motion was premature because documentary disclosure remained outstanding and cross-examinations had not yet occurred.
While attorneys are fiduciaries required to maintain and provide accounts under s. 32 of the Substitute Decisions Act, the evidentiary record was incomplete and untested.
The court directed the parties to exchange financial records and proceed with cross-examinations before seeking further relief.
