The respondent mother brought a motion to vary a temporary parenting order to require the applicant father's parenting time to be supervised.
The father brought a cross-motion for make-up parenting time and police enforcement of the existing order, alleging the mother repeatedly denied his parenting time.
The court dismissed the mother's motion, finding no cogent evidence that the child was at risk of harm in the father's care.
The court granted the father's cross-motion, awarding make-up parenting time and ordering police enforcement under section 36 of the Children's Law Reform Act due to the mother's repeated breaches of the parenting order.
