B. Tang

The appellant appealed a Committee of Adjustment decision that partially approved variances for a new two-storey detached house but refused a variance for the driveway location.

The appellant amended the plans to preserve a mature tree, addressing previous concerns.

The Tribunal applied the four tests under s. 45(1) of the Planning Act and found that the variances for the side yard setback and driveway location maintained the general intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, were desirable, and were minor.

The appeal was allowed in part, and the variances were authorized subject to conditions.