The Applicants brought a motion to compel the Respondent to comply with a previous order regarding the removal of obstructions from a right-of-way over the Respondent's property.
The court found that the Respondent had largely complied with the prior order, particularly concerning the shore well, based on a concession from the Applicants' counsel.
The court determined that other alleged obstructions (cedar trees, hostas, boulder, encroaching trees) were maintenance issues not proven to have been placed by the Respondent, and thus the Applicants were responsible for their removal at their own expense.
The motion was largely dismissed, with the Applicants only gaining permission to clear certain items at their own cost.
