The appellant mother appealed a trial judge's disposition regarding custody and access of three young girls.
She argued the trial judge failed to address her alternative proposal for sole custody if she returned to Toronto from Ottawa, and erred in finding she would not facilitate the respondent father's access.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the appellant had not put forward a parenting plan predicated on foregoing a move to Ottawa, and that the trial judge's factual findings regarding her inability to facilitate access were well supported by the evidence.
