The applicant sought child support, retroactive spousal support, and supervised parenting time.
The central issue was determining the respondent's income, which the applicant alleged was hidden in a complex web of international corporations, including one fraudulently transferred to her name.
The court found the respondent was the beneficial owner of the corporations, imputed his income at approximately $7 million annually, and ordered $20,000 per month in both child and spousal support.
The court also ordered supervised parenting time due to the respondent's history of deceit and the risk of child abduction to India or the UAE, which are not signatories to the Hague Convention.
