Amanda Newlove

The appellant appealed the Township of King Committee of Adjustment's refusal of a minor variance application to permit a two-storey backyard accessory structure.

Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement modifying the requested building height variance and adding conditions.

Based on uncontroverted expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the variances met the four-part test under section 45(1) of the Planning Act.

The appeal was allowed and the variances were authorized subject to conditions.

The applicants appealed the Township's refusal of a minor variance application to relocate a previously approved detached accessory building containing an accessory residential dwelling unit.

Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement proposal approved by Township Council.

Based on uncontroverted expert planning and environmental evidence, the Tribunal found the variances met the four tests under section 45(1) of the Planning Act, were consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, and had regard for matters of provincial interest.

The appeal was allowed and the variances were approved subject to conditions.