A. Kaur

The applicant sought reconsideration of a decision denying entitlement to attendant care benefits, various treatment plans, and case management services following a motor vehicle accident.

The applicant argued the adjudicator erred in the causation analysis and the weighing of medical evidence.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal dismissed the request for reconsideration, finding that the applicant was improperly attempting to relitigate the initial hearing and reweigh the evidence.

The Tribunal confirmed there was no error of law or fact that would have led to a different result.

The applicant sought various statutory accident benefits, including attendant care, physiotherapy, and occupational therapy, following a 2018 motor vehicle accident.

The adjudicator dismissed the application in its entirety, finding the applicant was a poor historian and failed to meet his onus to prove the expenses were reasonable and necessary or incurred.

The adjudicator preferred the respondent's medical evidence, noting the applicant's significant pre-existing health issues, including severe osteoarthritis that necessitated a knee replacement.

The respondent's request for costs was also denied.