The applicant sought vacant possession of his property from the respondent, his common-law spouse, who opposed the motion and sought interim spousal support, arguing their cohabitation agreement was void or unenforceable.
The court found a triable issue regarding the agreement's enforceability and the respondent's prima facie entitlement to support based on need.
The court ordered the respondent to vacate the property by a specific date and ordered the applicant to pay a lump sum towards past spousal support and ongoing monthly interim spousal support.
