The applicant father sought to retroactively adjust child support and rescind arrears, arguing his income had changed.
The respondent mother disputed the changes and opposed the rescission of arrears, seeking the table amount of child support.
The court found the father was intentionally underemployed in 2014 and 2015, imputing income based on his prior agreement, and therefore denied retroactive adjustment for those years.
For 2016, the court found the father was underemployed due to pursuing education and training, allowing a downward adjustment for that period.
Ongoing child support was set based on his current income.
The father was ordered to pay accumulated arrears for 2014 and 2015, as well as outstanding Section 7 arrears.
