The self-represented applicant sought an extension of time to file an application for judicial review of a decision by Legal Aid Ontario denying him duty counsel services and issuing a legal aid certificate instead.
The respondent opposed the motion, arguing the underlying application lacked apparent grounds for relief because the decision was not of a sufficiently public character to attract judicial review.
The court found that the applicant met the test for an extension, noting the minimal delay, lack of prejudice, reasonable explanation for the delay due to filing portal issues, and the existence of apparent grounds for relief.
The motion for an extension of time was granted.
